Boiler
Efficiency
Minimizing
energy costs while maintaining high
boiler reliability is one of the main
objectives of every utility system
operator. Optimization of boiler
combustion controls, minimizing stack
losses, and installation of heat
recovery equipment are obvious
big-ticket items. Water treatment,
although typically a smaller payback
item, is also important.
There
are many opportunities to improve
boiler system efficiency through the
use of chemical treatment.
Reduce
Boiler Scale
Boiler scale creates a problem in
boiler operation because scale
typically possesses a low thermal
conductivity (relative to a clean
metal surface). The presence of scale
is equivalent to having a thin film of
insulation across the path of heat
transfer from the furnace gases to the
boiler water. This heat-insulating
material retards heat transfer and
causes a loss in boiler efficiency.
Stack gas temperatures may increase as
the boiler absorbs less heat from the
furnace gases.
Heat
transfer may be reduced as much as
10%-12% by the presence of scale. A
scale approximately 1/8-inch thick may
cause an overall loss in boiler
efficiency of about 2%-3% in fire tube
boilers as well as in the convective
sections of water-tube boilers. Even
more important than the heat loss is
that scale can cause overheating of
the boiler tube metal and can result
in subsequent tube failures. Costly
repairs and boiler outages are the
result of such a condition.
Scale
formation in boilers can be controlled
by chemical treatment in combination
with the proper operation and
maintenance of all make-up and
feedwater pretreatment systems.
Phosphates, chelates, and polymers are
among the treatments in common use
today to condition and/or maintain
solubility of scale-forming solids
within the boiler.
Optimize
Boiler Blowdown Rates
Proper control of blowdown is a
critical part of boiler operation.
Insufficient blowdown may lead to
deposits or carryover, while excessive
blowdown will waste water, heat, and
chemicals. The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) has
developed a consensus on operating
practices for boiler feedwater and
blowdown that is related to operating
pressure. These suggestions apply for
both steam purity and deposition
control.
The
ASME limits are a good starting point
in establishing blowdown needs.
Operating experience with a particular
boiler then determines whether or not
it is practical to deviate from these
limits. A steam purity study can help
set new boiler limits which will
minimize solids carryover, while also
maintaining minimum blowdown rates.
Once
specific limits for boiler water
solids have been set, a practical way
is needed to control solids level on a
day-to-day basis. Conductivity, TDS,
silica, chlorides, and/or alkalinity
are often used to control the rate of
blowdown. These tests, however, are
often subject to interference and may
be difficult to measure accurately in
high-purity feedwater systems.
An
inert fluorescent tracer can be used
to accurately measure boiler cycles
and chemical feed. Typically, the
increased accuracy and confidence from
using an inert fluorescent tracer will
allow boiler cycles to be increased,
resulting in significant savings.
Reduce
Iron and Copper Pick-up in the
Feedwater
Oxygen scavengers developed within the
last 20 years may be more than their
name implies. Some provide both
chemical oxygen scavenging and
passivation of the pre-boiler or
feedwater system. (Passivation is the
formation of a very thin, dense,
protective iron oxide film, commonly
magnetite, on the metal surface.
Passivation typically increases the
corrosion resistance of a metal
surface.) These oxygen scavengers are
used to prevent corrosion in the
feedwater system. Reduced corrosion
minimizes the transport of corrosion
products to the boiler and also to the
superheaters if feedwater is used for
attemperation.
Reduce
Feedwater to the Boiler
The maximum achievable cycles in a
boiler is often limited by TDS or
conductivity. In boiler systems using
sulfite as an oxygen scavenger,
switching to a non-sulfite scavenger
can reduce feedwater TDS and improve
boiler system efficiency. Sulfite is
commonly fed to maintain a residual in
the boiler water (Table 1). In
contrast, the non-sulfite scavenger
dosage is based on a small feedwater
residual, typically about 1 ppm. In
addition, some of the alternative
scavengers do not themselves
contribute to boiler water TDS or
conductivity. For a typical boiler
operating at 200 psig, 550,000 lbs/day
steaming rate, and 5.5 cycles, the
savings from switching to a
non-sulfite scavenger would total
$23,000 in fuel costs annually.
Steam/Condensate
System
One economically attractive method of
maximizing energy efficiency and
boiler reliability is by increasing
the amount of condensate return.
Returned condensate, being condensed
steam, is extremely pure and has a
high heat content. Increased
condensate return can improve boiler
system economics through water and
energy conservation.
As
more condensate is returned, less
make-up is required, saving on water
and make-up water treatment costs. The
high purity allows for greater boiler
cycles of concentration, thus reducing
water and energy losses to blowdown.
The high heat content (typically in
excess of 180ºF) can provide
substantial energy savings. Additional
savings will also be noted in reduced
water treatment chemicals, water and
sewer costs. For a typical boiler
operating at 600 psig, 2,400,000
lbs/day steaming rate, and 13 cycles,
the savings from increasing the
condensate return 10% would total
$132,000 in fuel costs annually.
Corrosion
in condensate systems can limit the
quality or quantity of returned
condensate because of iron and copper
corrosion products, which can deposit
on boiler heat transfer surfaces. This
reduces heat transfer efficiency and
could cause tube failure. Condensate
corrosion control is required to
protect process equipment, lines,
tanks, as well as to maintain the
condensate as a quality feedwater
source. Corrosion of the condensate
system can result in increased
maintenance and equipment costs,
energy loss through steam leaks and
loss of process heat transfer
efficiency.
To
prevent condensate corrosion, volatile
neutralizing amines are typically used
to neutralize carbonic acid and raise
the condensate pH. These programs are
most effective when fed to maintain a
minimum pH of 8.5, ideally 8.8 to 9.2.
A blend of several amines will assure
that corrosion protection is
distributed throughout the entire
steam/condensate system. Filming
amines and a new, patented chemistry
are alternative condensate treatments.
Summary
There are many opportunities to
improve boiler system efficiency
through the use of chemical
treatments. Water treatment is an
important aspect of boiler operation
that can improve efficiency and
availability, or result in damage if
neglected. |